Something
similar happens to the player and bank bets, though not to any noticeable
degree. The bank bet becomes fractionally more profitable at the expense
of the player bet. It is hard to see why this should be the case,
but it probably has to do with the fact that the bank's more complicated
rules for drawing a third card allow it to compensate for changes
from the ordinary deck structure, while the player's "brute force"
rules for drawing a third card do not. For a more detailed discussion
of the effects of card removal.
Eliminating ties, the banker wins 50.68 percent of the time, compared
to the player's 49.32 percent. If ties are not counted as trials,
then the house advantage over the banker should be 1.1692 percent,
and over the player 1.3650 percent. In this instance, the house "tax"
on the banker is 2.5341 percent. It can be seen that the banker and
player are mutually exclusive entities in the tradition of other gambling
games, such as red and black at roulette, or the "do" and
"don't" bets at craps. Unlike other casino games, however,
there is no stigma attached to betting against what the other players
at the table are doing. If you sit down and bet banker while everyone
else is betting on a player streak, you will not be blamed if the
player hand wins. This may come as news to dice players.
|
